Defensible by designDecisions remain reviewable and evidenced.
Transparent processScope, ownership and boundaries stay visible.
Client-first partnershipWork starts with the operating need.
Secure by defaultAccess and sensitive data stay controlled.
Planning path

Website audits and technical remediation · From $300/month or custom project scope

Find the breakdown in evidence, priority and accountable remediation before the problem compounds.

Built for local service business with active demand but inconsistent digital follow-through. Turn a vague sense that something is wrong into a defensible action plan while keeping scope, dependencies and limitations visible.

Request a diagnostic review See full service details

The underlying service and pricing structure stay the same. This page simply focuses on the questions most relevant to your situation.

Choose the situation closest to yours

Learn the basicsOwner-operators Diagnose the problemLocal service businesses Compare approachesAgencies and consultants Plan the workGrowth-stage service businesses

What to focus on first

Start with the question blocking the next decision.

This page is for a business that can see the symptom but needs help identifying the constraint, ownership and sensible repair path.

01

Symptoms that justify a closer look

The immediate symptom may be technical, commercial or operational. The diagnostic task is to identify where evidence, priority and accountable remediation breaks and which owner can change it.

  • Several tools report problems but no one owns the next action
  • The business is deciding whether to repair, migrate or rebuild
  • Performance, SEO, accessibility and tracking issues overlap
  • A client or stakeholder needs evidence before approving work
02

What Lancaster would examine

The review focuses on observable evidence, current ownership and the dependency that must be resolved first.

  • What decision must the audit support?
  • Which pages, systems and public targets are authorised for review?
  • How will severity, confidence and limitations be recorded?
  • Who can approve remediation and verify completion?
03

Possible repair paths

The answer may be a bounded correction, a managed engagement, a deeper audit or a rebuild. The page does not assume the largest option is the right one.

  • Authorised crawl and technical review
  • SEO, accessibility, performance and delivery findings
  • Priority, evidence and limitation records
  • Branded reporting

Worth discussing when

This may be the right starting point when…

  • Several tools report problems but no one owns the next action
  • The business is deciding whether to repair, migrate or rebuild
  • Performance, SEO, accessibility and tracking issues overlap
  • A client or stakeholder needs evidence before approving work

Another starting point may be better

Start elsewhere if these are true.

  • You want unauthorised scanning of systems you do not control
  • You expect an automated score to replace professional judgement
  • No one will own remediation after the report is delivered

Outside this scope: A website audit is not a penetration test, legal opinion, accessibility certification or guarantee of complete coverage. Deeper review may require specialist scope.

Tell Curtis what is going on

Show us the problem and the business impact.

Provide the current website and the clearest symptom. The response will focus on evidence, priority and the next responsible action.

What happens after submission

  1. Your request stays attached to this service and starting point so the context is not lost.
  2. Curtis reviews the problem, timing and what would actually help.
  3. The response may be a question, guide, website review, scoped recommendation or another direction if Lancaster is not the right solution.

Submitting sends the request for review. Nothing starts and nothing is billed without your approval.

Keep researching

Read the guidance connected to this service.

Know what to fix first

Get a clear review of the website, visibility and follow-up.

We will separate urgent problems from useful improvements and recommend the smallest sensible next step—without pretending every site needs a full rebuild.

Get a website reviewBook a strategy call
CallFree reviewFind a starting point